While the overall total for today's enactment vote in the House was essentially identical to yesterday (97-46, vs. 97-45), there were some notable switches in the individual votes.<br><br>Today<b> 63</b> Democrats voted for 1932, a net <b>gain of five</b> more than yesterday.<br>
<b>32</b> Republicans voted for 1932, a net <b>loss of six</b> from yesterday<br><b>2</b> Independents voted for 1932, <b>one more</b> than yesterday.<br><br>Seven Democrats, who voted yesterday to oppose, today switched to favor 1932:<span style=""><b><br>
</b> </span>*CLARK
of Millinocket, <a href="mailto:clarkhe@prexar.com">clarkhe@prexar.com</a><span style=""><br> </span>*GROSE of Woolwich,
<a href="mailto:RepCarol.Grose@legislature.maine.gov">RepCarol.Grose@legislature.maine.gov</a><span style=""><br> </span>*HARLOW of Portland, <a href="mailto:charlow1@maine.rr.com">charlow1@maine.rr.com</a><span style=""><br>
</span>*HASKELL of Portland, <a href="mailto:annehask@maine.rr.com">annehask@maine.rr.com</a><span style=""><br> </span>*HINCK of Portland, <a href="mailto:RepJon.Hinck@legislature.maine.gov">RepJon.Hinck@legislature.maine.gov</a>
<span style=""><br> </span>*MILLS of Farmington, <a href="mailto:jmills@mainelegal.net">jmills@mainelegal.net</a><span style=""><br> </span>*SCHATZ of Blue Hill,
<a href="mailto:bluehillfarm@gwi.net">bluehillfarm@gwi.net</a><br><b style=""><br></b>Four Democrats, who were absent yesterday, voted today to support:<br>
BARSTOW of Gorham, (Y) <a href="mailto:crbarstow@gmail.com">crbarstow@gmail.com</a><br>
CONOVER of Oakland, (Y) <a href="mailto:RepJill.Conover@legislature.maine.gov">RepJill.Conover@legislature.maine.gov</a><br>
KAENRATH of South Portland, (Y) <a href="mailto:BryanKaenrath@verizon.net">BryanKaenrath@verizon.net</a><br>
TUTTLE of Sanford, (Y) <a href="mailto:RepJohn.Tuttle@legislature.maine.gov">RepJohn.Tuttle@legislature.maine.gov</a><br><br>Three Republicans, who yesterday voted to oppose 1932, today voted to support:<span style=""><br>
</span>*DUPREY of Hampden,
<a href="mailto:repduprey@hotmail.com">repduprey@hotmail.com</a><span style=""><br> </span>*LANSLEY of Sabattus,
<a href="mailto:slansley2@aol.com">slansley2@aol.com</a><span style=""><br> </span>*McKANE of Newcastle, <a href="mailto:Jon@jonmckane.com">Jon@jonmckane.com</a>
<br><br>One Independent, who yesterday voted to oppose 1932, today voted to support:<b style=""><span style=""><br></span></b><span style=""> </span>*SAVIELLO of Wilton, <a href="mailto:drtom16@hotmail.com">drtom16@hotmail.com</a>
<br><br>One Republican, who yesterday was absent, today voted in support of 1932:<span style=""><br> </span><span style="">
</span>*EMERY of Cutler, <a href="mailto:ianemery@ptc-me.net">ianemery@ptc-me.net</a><br><br><b>[Please take a moment to thank the sixteen Representatives above]</b><br><br>Four Democrats, who yesterday voted to support 1932, today voted to oppose:<b style=""><span style=""><br>
</span></b><span style=""> </span>*BLANCHARD of Old Town,
<a href="mailto:rdblanch@localnet.com">rdblanch@localnet.com</a><br><span style=""> </span>*FISCHER of Presque Isle,
<a href="mailto:RepJeremy.Fischer@legislature.maine.gov">RepJeremy.Fischer@legislature.maine.gov</a><span style=""><br> </span>*FISHER of Brewer,
<a href="mailto:dustyfish@hotmail.com">dustyfish@hotmail.com</a><span style=""><br> </span>*HOGAN of Old Orchard
Beach, <a href="mailto:ghogan@gwi.net">ghogan@gwi.net</a>
<br><br>One Democrat who was absent yesterday voted today to oppose:<br>
DUNN of Bangor, (N) <a href="mailto:RepMichael.Dunn@legislature.maine.gov">RepMichael.Dunn@legislature.maine.gov</a><br><br>Nine Republicans, who yesterday voted to support 1932, today voted to oppose:<b style=""><span style=""><br>
</span></b><span style=""> </span>*CROSTHWAITE of Ellsworth,
<a href="mailto:bcrosthwaite@verizon.net">bcrosthwaite@verizon.net</a><span style=""><br> </span>*FITTS of Pittsfield,
<a href="mailto:RepStacey.Fitts@legislature.maine.gov">RepStacey.Fitts@legislature.maine.gov</a><span style=""><br> </span>*KNIGHT of Livermore Falls, <a href="mailto:LGary.Knight@usa.net">LGary.Knight@usa.net</a><span style=""><br>
</span>*MAREAN of Hollis,
<a href="mailto:lindonfarm@sacoriver.net">lindonfarm@sacoriver.net</a><span style=""><br> </span>*McDONOUGH of Scarborough,<span style=""> </span><span style=""><br> </span>*MOORE of Standish,
<a href="mailto:garymooreforstandish@mycingular.blackberry.net">garymooreforstandish@mycingular.blackberry.net</a><span style=""><br> </span>*PINKHAM of Lexington Township, <a href="mailto:wrightfor88@tds.net">wrightfor88@tds.net</a><span style=""><br>
</span>*PLUMMER of Windham, <a href="mailto:RepG.Plummer@legislature.maine.gov">RepG.Plummer@legislature.maine.gov</a><span style=""><br> </span>*SARTY of Denmark,
<a href="mailto:rwsarty@fairpoint.net">rwsarty@fairpoint.net</a>
<br>
<br>Three Democrats who voted for 1932 yesterday were absent today:<b style=""><span style=""><br></span></b><span style=""> </span>*HAYES of Buckfield,
<a href="mailto:terry@megalink.net">terry@megalink.net</a><span style=""><br> </span>*KOFFMAN of Bar
Harbor, <a href="mailto:koffman@coa.edu">koffman@coa.edu</a><span style=""><br> </span>*WEDDELL of Frankfort,
<a href="mailto:RepLance.Weddell@legislature.maine.gov">RepLance.Weddell@legislature.maine.gov</a><br><br><br>